US Building More Wall On Border, But Not Ours

Just like in Iraq, the Sinai, Saudi Arabia, India, and Isreal, Pakistan has decided that walls work. http://news.antiwar.com/2009/07/03/pakistani-pm-seeks-us-aid-for-massive-border-wall/ They work even in America. But Jorge Bush did not want them and Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson sabatoged the planned 800 miles of double fencing, defunding and allowing DHS not to build the whole fence. That they work is the problem. Democrats want more illegals here, liberals want more suicide bombers in Isreal, Democrats want more Pashtun fighters in Afghanistan, that is the story of fences. Isrealis were smart enough to build their fences, but the Obama Regime doesn't want to save any lives here or stop illegal immigration.

Kabuki Theater Immigration Enforcement

There are tens of thousands of employers in the United States. The employers of illegal aliens are all well know to the IRS and Social Security Administration. The SSA has a list of huge employers most of whose employees use invalid or stolen Social Security numbers. However, the Obama Regime Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement, are going through a stylized pantomime of enforcing the immigration laws of the United States. http://apps.grouptivity.com/socialmail/main.do?uId=132717&tId=132410&pk=19769701315&acn=zj!d9&pId=HeOHCWXaPRs=&acn=zj!d9 and http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/01/obama-launches-investigation-companies-employ-illegal-immigrants/

Six hundred employers of various sizes, instead of selecting the most egregious offenders, will go through the inconvinience of the inspection of their employee records. This practice could be effective, but John Morton, the new head of ICE, a man with no immigration enforcement experience, has adopted a policy that could be effective, but is deliberately not. While the companies are alleged to be selected based on intelligence from the field, in fact, the selectees are not the most flagrant violators, but random victims of a non-enforcement strategy. In years gone by, auditing I-9 forms held by employers was an effective tool, but seldom used. Now, inspecting I-9 forms is not really necessary, because using databases from the IRS and SSA, can provide the same results, identifying illegal aliens, quite quickly and without having to send anyone to the offending company's place of business. http://federaleagent86.blogspot.com/2009/06/just-how-easy-immigration-enforcement.html
All aspects of an investigation and the subsequent enforcement can take place from behind a desk.

However, the Obama Regime has decided to waste millions in a physical review of minor offenders on-location records with a view of a long and costly criminal prosecution of the offending employer. However, as the articles point out, the employer has an out if he does not use E-Verify. Any document presented by an illegal alien must be accepted at face value or the employer faces the wrath of the communists at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, charge with racial discrimination. As I said before, efforts to convict employers are either long and drawn out or ultimately unsuccessful, and dependant on an agressive United States Attorney. http://federaleagent86.blogspot.com/2009/05/eight-year-investigation.html

Since the Obama Regime is hostile to E-Verify, all the above action will be for naught, and might just result in the Obama Regime giving out employment authorization to the illegals themselves, as they did in the Yamato Engine case. http://federaleagent86.blogspot.com/2009/06/less-than-ringing-endorsement.html

So, it appears that Mark Krikorian shares my view that this is the prelude to amnesty. Glad to see he has come over to my position now. http://federaleagent86.blogspot.com/2009/05/real-meaning-behind-new-immigration.html

No Ham Sandwiches In Burlington County

An illegal alien reckless driver, Jose Luis Galindo-Sanchez, killed Amy Voorhees in Burlington County, NJ. http://blogs.phillyburbs.com/news/bct/no-criminal-charges-in-fatal-evesham-accident/#more-16832 Interestingly enough the County Prosecutor, Robert D. Bernardi, was no billed when he presented the case to the Grand Jury. Now, as I have said before, a good prosecutor rules the Grand Jury and can indict a ham sandwich if he needs to. The only reason to be no billed, e.g. have the Grand Jury decline to indict upon presentation of evidence, is that the prosecutor did not want an indictment. Usually, what a prosecutor does before a Grand Jury is to seek an indictment, not just present evidence and let the Grand Jury decide. A Grand Jury is usually presented with evidence, witnesses, then given an indictment for them to review and vote on. A Grand Jury is not just presented with evidence and witnesses and asked if they think an indictment is necessary, they are presented with an indictment as a fait acompli. It is sort of like your boss asking, it is not a question, it is a suggestion, or a demand, depending on how diplomatic the prosecutor is.

The only reason not to get an indictment is that the prosecutor doesn't want an indictment. This is common in police shooting cases, where the prosecutor suggests to the jury that they should no bill. It appears that this happened here. In this case Bernardi appears to be on the side of an illegal alien. Why, perhaps Burlington County is a sanctuary. A sanctuary for reckless drivers. More blood of Americans spilled on the streets. I guess Bernardi likes to see that. Either that or he could not indict a ham sandwich.

Hilton Hotels and Terrorism

It appears that Hilton Hotels is a big supporter of terrorism. According to the Counterterrorism Blog the terrorist group Hizb ut-Tahrir is having a conference on imposing Islam on all Americans. http://counterterrorismblog.org/ That appears to be just fine with Hilton Hotels and the Hilton Oak Lawn. (708) 425-7800 9333 S Cicero Ave, Oak Lawn, IL 60453, OALHI_GM@hilton.com

Give them a call and let them know your opinion of those who assist terrorists.

Case Closed

The Center for Immgration Studies has confirmed my earlier observation that the new Obama policy on illegal aliens will be the old Jorge Bush policy of catch and release. http://cis.org/Vaughan/CatchandRelease-287(g) My discovery of the new old policy is here. http://federaleagent86.blogspot.com/2009/06/it-begins-or-more-accurately-it-begins.html

Basically, the policy of subverting 287(g) where local law enforcement arrest and process illegal aliens is ending based on an administrative decree, in violation of the law and an impeachable offense. Baraka Hussein Obama took an oath to see that the laws of the United States were faithfully executed, but violated that oath by refusing to arrest and detain illegal aliens caught in the U.S. The illegal aliens will add to the already unmanageble numbers of absconding illegal aliens who have refused to appear for the hearings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review. It also tells us that the upcoming amnesty will include illegal alien absconders, those already ordered deported and who refused to appear or leave as ordered.

Immigrants and Healthcare

The Canadians are up in arms that a criminal was denied entry to the United States. The Candadian are not up in arms that their healthcare system cannot provide for an infant's healthcare. The Candians are not up in arms that Americans are paying for their healthcare. Americans are not up in arms that the Obama healthcare plan would make Ava Stinson eligible for this expensive healthcare for free. Americans are not up in arms having to subsidize the out of wedlock healthcare of Ava Stinson. http://cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20090626/090626_BABY_PASSPORTS/20090626/?hub=CP24Home (h/t Hot Air
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/28/canadacare-sends-baby-to-us-for-treatment/)

It appears that Canadians think that America is evil because we can provide healthcare to every Canadian, but don't have a nationalized healthcare system. Canadians, like Mexicans, think that America owes them free healthcare that their governments cannot provide in a nationalized system. As I said before, Obama's plan would make the expoitation of the American taxpayer completely legal and aboveboard, unlike now as it is hidden from the taxpayers by giving free care to illegal aliens at county hospitals. http://federaleagent86.blogspot.com/2009/06/its-out-health-care-reform-to-cover.html Under Obama's plan, Stinson would qualify for free healthcare because she is a lawfully present alien. Of course, the absurd thing is that she is supposed to get free quality healthcare under Canada's nationalized free system, but obviously can't because it is a nationalized system.

But, as I learned recently, the Obama plan also includes money for illegal aliens. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124536864955329439.html (h/t National Review http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZGU3YTI0ODliNjlkYzJmOWE2ZWU1ZjJkOWE5MDNmYjA=)

"Page 118 [Actually page 120.] targets $33.95 billion to treat the 'special medically underserved population,' including the homeless, public-housing residents, and “migratory and seasonal agricultural workers.” How much of this money will wind up treating illegal aliens?"

So, besides providing free medical care to any alien lawfully admitted, it will also serve illegal aliens. Now, since this new national health insurance government option were just for legal residents, then there would be no need for special programs for groups like seasonal agricultural workers, as they could just walk into any doctor's office, hospital, or clinic to get their care, as they would now have insurance. This section of the act is obviously designed to apply to illegal aliens.

It Is Starting

In the early nineties, the Clinton war on gunowners and his political enemies started with the trumped up charges leveled against Randy Weaver and the attack on the Branch Dividians at Waco, resulting in the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oaklahoma City. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge The Obama Regime has started its own war on Americans today with the arrest of Hal Turner for suggesting that someone kill Federal appealate judges on the 7th Circuit of the U.S. Appeals Court. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-internet-radio-arrest-25-jun25,0,7879524.story Turner has been a thorn in the side of the federal courts and is a racist, just like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Obama's pastor Jerimiah Wright.

The case against Turner is obviously flawed, as he did not threaten to kill anyone, just suggested that someone else might want to do it. However, the method of the charging of Turner was the most sinister. It was by Criminal Complaint. http://207.41.16.133/rfcViewFile/09cr542.pdf This method is very strange, and is usually only used in cases where a quick, but not immediate arrest is wanted by the government. In cases where there is iminent danger cause by a potential crime, federal agents, specifically FBI special agents, are authorized to make probable cause arrests. Obviously, if the government thought that Turner had really made a threat, which includes an immediate ability to commit the crime and intent, an arrest could be made based on probable cause. Obviously though, the government did not think that Turner had either the means or intent to kill the three judges, as they took the time for the FBI special agent involved, John Marsh, write up a criminal complaint. This probably took at least one day, and did not include the time necessary for the assigned Assistant United States Attorney, who is interestingly not named in the Criminal Complaint, to review it for legal sufficiency.

But more importantly, a Criminal Complaint was used because the United States Attorneys Office did not want to go to a Grand Jury. In Chicago, Grand Juries sit almost every day of the week, and if the USAO had time to have Marsh write up a complaint and have it reviewed for legal sufficiency, it therefore had enough time to present the case to a Grand Jury. While I have heard an Assistant United States Attorney brag that Grand Jury could be let to indict a ham sandwich, which probably is true, I have also seen Grand Jurys No Bill an indictment. And, readers, that is not something that United States Attorneys like to see. AUSAs who get No Billed are told in no uncertian terms that they have to go to a new Grand Jury and get the indictment.

In Turner's case there is scant evidence of a threat, much less intent and means to carry it out. Any Grand Jury, despite the ham sandwich, would not have indicted. That is why a Criminal Complaint was necessary, and very clever, as the USAO went to one judge to get a Criminal Complaint in alleged threats to other judges. No Magistrate Judge would ever do anything to anger more senior judges. Remember Magistrate Judges are not appointed by the President, but appointed by a vote of District Judges for ten year terms. If a Magistrate Judge refused to sign a Criminal Complaint concerning threats to other federal judges in all work closely together and undoubtedly are close socially, that Magistrate Judge would have no chance of reappointment to a new term.

Instead of being laughed out of the Grand Jury Room, the USAO took the easy route of getting a Criminal Complaint, for articulable reason other than they could not get a Grand Jury to indict on a obviously bogus charge.

This is the opening shot by the Obama Regime against what liberals call hate talk, especially what they call hate talk radio. The governments refusal to support talk radio host Michael Savage after he was labeled a proponent of hate by the British Government was a first sign of the new Obama Regime campaign to criminalize opposition to the Obama Regime. But for the first actual arrest and prosecution for speech, they chose a less sympathetic and obviously less powerful victim, a racist, but one of the unapproved racist beliefs, as Jackson, Sharpton, and Wright are still free to peddle their version of hate speech.

While Turner may be unsympathetic to most people, this is just a start. Others will be immigration restrictionist groups, talk radio, gun owners, and other unapproved groups. Remember, the Clinton Regime tried to blame Oklahoma City on the eminently respectable Rush Limbaugh, who eschews the race and immigration issues, but he was blamed for OKC even though he did not ever address Ruby Ridge, Waco, or the gun issue.

Further evidence of the Obama Regime plan, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATFE) has been harrassing and threatening lawful gunowners who live in Texas. http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=4990 "One reportedly demanded that a gun owner return home early from a business trip, while another threatened to "report" an NRA member as 'refusing to cooperate.'" Interestingly enough, there is no federal crime of refusing to cooperate, it is actually called the right against self-incrimination. It is in the Constitution, like the right to own firearms. It is clear that the Obama Regime is intollerant of gun owners and free speech. They are no choosing their targets narrowly, but their targets will soon widen, entailing all who oppose them.

Turner verbally castigated the 7th Court of Appeals judges for denying Second Amendment rights to citizens in Chicago, but, as quoted on LewRockwell.com, http://www.lewrockwell.com/case/case36.1.html, 'Judge Alex Kozinski of the 9th Circuit Court in 2003 wrote in part:

'The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed – where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once.'"

This appears to be that once, again.