Thursday, May 21, 2015

Vindicated, But The Black War On The Police Continues In Baltimore

The grossly incompetent black State's Attorney in Baltimore, Marilyn Mosby, has achieved another low in her prosecutorial career, she was able to indict a ham sandwich with a jury of morons.  The initial charges against the Baltimore Six have been dropped and a Grand Jury indictment has been obtained.  The most interesting part of the indictment was that the most obviously false charges, and the ones that leave Mosby vulnerable to criminal indictment for civil rights violation, the charge of false imprisonment, were dropped, but for equally laughable reckless endangerment.

Baltimore Sun May 21, 2015 by Ian Duncan
Subtle Differences After Indictment In Gray Case Could Be Sign Of Shift In Thinking
The differences between indictments returned Thursday against six Baltimore Police officers in the death of Freddie Gray and the initial charges filed this month suggest prosecutors have refined their approach to the case, legal analysts say — or, possibly, that a grand jury balked at the some of the counts they had sought.
Baltimore lawyers who are not connected to the case say some of the changes could mean prosecutors are focusing less on Gray's initial arrest — which State's Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby said this month was unlawful — while others suggest prosecutors are trying to give themselves a backstop should any part of the case prove faulty.

The significant change is that Mosby is desperate, the initial charges were laughable and looked to be dismissed at the initial hearing, but a Grand Jury indictment supersedes the information used for the initial arrest.

But Lt. Brian Rice, and Officers Edward Nero and Garrett Miller, who were involved in the initial stop of Gray, are no longer accused of false imprisonment. That charge had struck many lawyers as unusual; police said it could leave officers worried that an error of judgment might lead to criminal charges.
What's not clear is why that charge has disappeared. Kurt Nachtman, a former prosecutor in Baltimore, said it was likely the grand jurors did not find grounds to support it.
"You would think if the prosecution handpicked the charges they'd be the same across the board," he said.
But Page Croyder, another former prosecutor, said it was possible that Mosby's office decided the false imprisonment charge was a mistake and did not offer it to the grand jury as an option.
Another change: All the officers now face a charge of reckless endangerment, a misdemeanor with a maximum sentence of five years in prison.

A review of the statute shows that the arresting officers cannot be guilty of the charge:

(a)  Prohibited.- A person may not recklessly: 
(1) engage in conduct that creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another; 

There is no evidence that the pursuit and arrest of Freddie Gray was illegal, as even now Mosby has dropped those charges.  Gray was uninjured during the arrest; his injury, according to the indictment, was caused by his striking his head while in the police van well after he was placed in the van.  The only officer responsible for Gray not being secured by a seat-belt is the officer who drove the transport van.  In fact, Gray was quite vocal in the van, claiming breathing problems unrelated to his injuries, and making such a disturbance that the van had to stop after some distance and leg shackles placed on Gray.  So there is no proximate relationship between the acts of the arresting officers and the injuries that caused the death of Gray. This, again, leaves Mosby and her henchmen vulnerable to criminal and civil liability for civil rights violations under Title 18 United States Code Section 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law and 42 USC Section 1983, Civil Action For Deprivation of Rights.  Best wishes to the officers and their attorneys.  

So, it is clear that the charges of reckless endangerment, especially against the arresting officers, are designed to discourage the police from arresting black criminals.  The charge is essentially punishment for arresting a black man.  This is the shape of things to come, and also reflected in the Obama Regime's plan to fund radical left-wing anti-police groups and Obama Regime's crazed claims that the police over-arrest blacks.

Minority Occupation Government Hunting The Great White Defendant

Latest up on VDare:

Minority Occupation Government Hunts For Great White Defendant, Ignores Muslims
Just days before the attack on Pamela Geller and Geert Wilders by Muslim terrorists, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) issued a joint bulletin warning of the danger of “domestic terrorism” along the lines of the Oklahoma City bombing [DHS-FBI Bulletin: Twenty Years After Oklahoma City Bombing, Domestic Extremism Remains a Persistent Threat, April 19, 2015]. Even as Muslim terrorism becomes the new normal in the West and the Islamic State gains ground abroad, there’s disturbing evidence American law enforcement seems determined to ignore Islamic terrorism in favor of the more Politically Correct cause of hunting the Great White Defendant.

Donate to VDare here.

Saturday, May 16, 2015

Neo-Cons Starting To Notice

It appears that neo-cons are starting to notice black criminality.  Is this the neo-cons opportunism after the failure of the Rainbow Alliance in the 2014 elections or are they serious about black crime. This is not a new issue.  The Black War On Asians is an issue boiling in the Asian, especially Chinese and Korean, communities.  Whether it be violent crime or affirmative action, Asians are getting riled up.

The Weekly Standard, May 15, 2015, by Dennis Halpin
The Other Racial Divide
When guests at a North Korea Freedom Week dinner in Northern Virginia learned the Korean-American pastor at our table led a Maryland church, they immediately asked about the situation in Baltimore. It was May 1, and National Guard troops had been deployed to the city three days earlier to help quell the unrest sparked by the death of a man in police custody. The pastor let out a deep sigh before responding. A few members of his congregation had lost everything. After working diligently for years building small businesses in a new country, they watched their efforts literally go up in flames as looters trashed their shops and carted off their merchandise.
The crisis reminded many in America’s growing community of two million Korean immigrants and their descend-ants of another city’s devastation two decades earlier. Baltimore’s riots began two days before the anniversary of the outbreak of the 1992 Los Angeles riots, in which Koreatown, the heart of the Korean diaspora in America, was subjected to pogrom-like attacks by irate mobs. Though Asian Americans had nothing to do with either Rodney King’s or Freddie Gray’s injuries, they appear to have been the targets of some of the animosity unleashed by rioters.



Of course, this is a long time coming for the neo-cons.  For whatever reason they have not been at the forefront of the black crime issue, aside for cheer-leading for Rudy Guiliani in appreciation for making the neo-cons safer in NYC.  Of course, this after years of ignoring black-on-white crime as a useful and successful wedge issue in politics that can help turn out working class white voters, not quite the social class the predominately Jewish neo-cons are comfortable with.

Perhaps this is a realization that both the reality, morality, and the politics of the moment are in alignment especially given that the Republicans can win when they use the issue, George Herbert Walker Bush and Willie Horton as evidence, and the failure of Mitt Romney to develop a wedge issue to turn out whites in his favor and the success of Obama negative advertising to suppress the white vote.  This is especially important as Hillary! has endorsed black crime.

Will the neo-cons have the nerve to use the issue?  It can remove Asians from the Democrat coalition with ease and turn out whites.  A two-fer.  Time will tell.  Where is the next Lee Atwater?  America cries out for you! 

Or will Halpin get the Derbyshire treatment?

Thursday, May 14, 2015

Freddie Gray And The End Of Policing Black Crime

My latest up on VDare:

The Freddie Gray Fiasco And The Coming End of Policing, Federale, VDare, May 11, 2015
The case against the officers involved in the arrest of the late Freddie Gray of Baltimore is already collapsing. Lawyers for the six officers charged (three of whom are African-American) identify the openly admitted political motivations of State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby and her conflict of interest as wife of Councilman Nick Mosby (email him)as compelling reasons to remove her from the case [Officers in Freddie Gray case move to dismiss charges, by Justin Fenton, Baltimore Sun, May 8, 2015]. The charges filed against the officers are filled with errors because of Mosby’s haste to seize the political spotlight instead of undertaking a proper investigation [Police charges in Freddie Gray case are incompetent at best, by Page Croyder, Baltimore Sun, May 5, 2015]. The arrest documents for some of the officers were even filled out with the wrong names [Freddie Gray arrest documents drawn up for wrong people, by Justin Fenton, Baltimore Sun, May 4, 2015]...

Contribute here.

Sunday, May 10, 2015

Why Is A False Rape Accusation Activist Supporting Black Crime?

Community of the Wrongfully Accused blog (COWTA) has adopted "the narrative" on the death of convicted felon Freddie Gray.  A blog dedicated and created to advocate for men wrongfully accused of rape and the raison d'etre of the blog, has for some reason, most likely a Clintonesque desire to maintain the viability of the defense of men's rights when accused of a crime as part of a crocodile strategy of avoiding being throw to the wolves.  In order to defend men's rights vis-a-vis false accusation of sexual assault, COWTA surrenders white men to sacrifice on the alter of false accusations of racism and excessive force.

COWTA May 1, 2015
Baltimore, Baltimore, Baltimore
It is just awful -- and terribly unfair -- that Baltimore has been tarnished by the Freddie Gray incident. Tourists should have no fear about visiting the historic town, including the world famous Inner Harbor. After all, you probably won't get your spine severed unless you're a black male and you do something terribly stupid, like make eye contact with a police officer.

For a blog that usually gets so much correct, it is shocking that in one paragraph of a mere two sentences, the writer gets so much wrong, and falsely accuses 5 male police officers of heinous crimes with absolutely no evidence.

First, and astoundingly, the defender of male victims of false accusations of rape, has decided that Baltimore is a safe place unless you cross the cops.  Well, that is not true.  Crime in Baltimore is rampant and one of the top ten most dangerous big cities in the United States. And the Color of Crime in Bulletimore is black.

Second, Freddie Gray did not have his spine severed, but died when his head struck a bolt on the wall of a police van.

The Daily Dot, April 30, 2015, by Dell Cameron
Leaked Autopsy Sheds New Light On Freddie Gray's Death
An unnamed law enforcement source says that Gray, whose death sparked protests in Baltimore and cities around the country this week, was instead killed by injuries that occurred after he was placed unrestrained into the back of a police transport vehicle.
A medical examiner found that the injury happened when Gray’s head slammed into the back of the police van, according to the report. The head injury he sustained apparently matches a bolt in the rear of the vehicle.

So, Freddie Gray died not because he made eye-contact with a police officer, but because of an accident due to not having been seat-belted in.

Furthermore, COWTA claims that Bulletimore's Inner Harbor is safe for tourists.  But, in fact, Inner Harbor is being targeted by black gangs seeking white victims.

WND May 18, 2012 by Colin Flaherty
Call For Crackdown On Black-On-White Terror
A state lawmaker in Maryland, concerned about “black youths” who are “terrorizing” Baltimore’s upscale Inner Harbor, wants the governor to send in state troopers to make the area safe.
Pat McDonough, a member of the Maryland legislature, has been accused of launching a “racially tinged publicity stunt” but stands by his comments.
“The Inner Harbor is a dangerous place for residents and visitors,” said McDonough. “And it does us no good to avoid this hard truth: Black youth are responsible for a sustained and dangerous period of violence in one of Baltimore’s nicest neighborhoods.”
The most recent episode of racial violence happened on St. Patrick’s Day. A white tourist was attacked, beaten, robbed and stripped of his clothes by a gang of laughing and violent black people, reports confirm.

So, Inner Harbor isn't safe. Baltimore isn't safe.  Why is COWTA claiming it is?  Why is COWTA so outraged about an accidental death of a felon?  Clearly COWTA is trying to maintain their viability in a politically correct atmosphere that his hostile to COWTA's issue, defending men against rape, so COWTA adopts a position on another politically correct issue, black crime, in an effort to deflect criticism by the radical left for defending men's rights against false accusations of rape.  Basically, COWTA sacrifices all whites, but specifically male police officers, and more specifically white male police officers on the alter of political correctness on the race issue in order to maintain the political viability of criticizing the feminist Social Justice Warrior (SWJ) movement's attacks on men.

Clearly, the political calculation on that isn't working out, and it exposes COWTA for hypocrisy and lack of principle for supporting the lies against whites, white men, and white male police officers.  In the end though, men in general and COWTA in particular, are going to get no support from blacks in the battle to protect men from false accusations of rape by supporting black lies about crime and police officers.  COWTA should stick to what they do, expose the lies of feminists and SWJs about men and rape.

Saturday, April 11, 2015

Interesting Case Involving Loretta Lynch

Or, more precisely, not involving Loretta Lynch.  Lynch is touted by RINOs like Orrin Hatch as some sort of no-nonsense prosecutor.  She is the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, but she appears to be uninterested in doing her job, especially if it involves the prosecution of immigration law violations, even those connected with terrorism.

WABC-TV April 10, 2015 by Jim Dolan 
Bronx Woman Married 10 Times Now Charged With Not Paying Subway Fare 

BRONX, N.Y. (WABC) -- A Bronx woman facing felony charges after authorities say she got married 10 times in an apparent marriage scam was arrested after court Friday.
Authorities say Liana Barrientos, 39, and her niece Tracy Barrientos walked through the gate of a subway station at 149th Street and Grand Concourse and did not pay the fare.
They are charged with theft of service and criminal trespass. 
Liana Barrientos had been arraigned earlier on two counts of filing a false instrument. She pleaded not guilty. 
Those false instruments were an application for a marriage license and the signed marriage license itself, executed in the spring of 2010, which stated this was her first and only marriage. The groom was a man named Salle Keita, whom she wed March 4, 2010, according to the indictment. 
Police believe she was marrying men to get them into the country and apparently wed nine times between 1999 and 2002, never bothering to legally change her name.
She is believed to be currently married to four people, and at one time, she was married to eight of them at the same time. 
The case was brought to the attention of the Bronx County District Attorney's Office by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security's
Investigation Division.  
They indicated that seven of the men are from so-called "red-flagged" countries, which included Egypt, Turkey, Georgia, Pakistan, and Mali. 

Very good work, or shall one say, very slow work by ICE SVU, since her immigration fraud is almost 15 years old.  But the dog that isn't barking here is that Loretta Lynch decided not to prosecute a woman who aided in immigration fraud on behalf of those from terrorist countries.  It certainly is consistent with her support for the Obama Regime Administrative Amnesty, but it is also so openly contemptuous of U.S. immigration law.  Why is the Bronx District Attorney's Office prosecuting a serious immigration fraud case involving terrorism when that is something that a United States Attorney should be doing in any event, but especially when involving terrorism.  It does though tell us the contempt that Lynch has for immigration law, the Constitution, and the people of the United States.  Certainly part of the Obama Regime plan to elect a new people.

Saturday, April 4, 2015

War On White Speech

The ongoing war on white Christians by homosexuals is not the only assault on freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution.  Apparently private communications unrelated to public employment are subject to investigation and punishment.  But were not talking about communists, Islamists, or other seditious or treasonous speech.

In both Ferguson, MO, and San Francisco, CA,  public employees, private communications are being searched without any legal basis and threats of legal action including discipline and termination are being invoked.

First, Ferguson.  The Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division (CRD) conducted a parallel investigation of the Ferguson Police Department (FPD) while on their jihad against Darren Wilson, which flopped spectacularly.  Consequently, the CRD fell back upon a "pattern and practices" investigation of the FPD, and found nothing other than some statistics that showed the FPD stopped, searched, and arrested blacks at a rate commensurate with black crime in Ferguson, and elsewhere. The CRD also published some lurid tales from blacks claiming outrageous criminal abuse by specific officers, but took no action against those specific officers, which is telling; CRD makes wild accusations of specific criminal acts by individual police officer making false arrests, illegal searches, and illegal use-of-force, and does nothing.  Which really tells us that the alleged victims were as unreliable as the perjurers who gave statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).  For the uninitiated, that means that CRD had nothing and was deliberately using perjured testimony in the "pattern and practice" investigation, similar testimony that it rejected in the case against Wilson.

What it did find was that some police officers and other Ferguson municipal employees used their municipal email accounts to email personal communications.  Now, most public employers tell their employees that they may not use government resources for personal use.  However, many explicitly allow it for de minimus use, such as personal phone calls and emailing and even those prohibiting such de minimus use never enforce that policy, rendering it null and void, not legally enforceable. Furthermore, few public employers make any effort to take any action to monitor de minimus use for content.  Basically it's don't ask, don't tell, don't care.  Of course, unless the CRD rolls into town and decides to make an issue of the personal opinions legally expressed and protected by the Constitution. There is no hate speech exemption to the First Amendment.  While the emails were  mildly racist jokes that one municipal employee sent to police officers, Ferguson had a de facto if not de jure, policy of allowing private use of email. While generally, there is no privacy right in your work email, unless there is a policy of inspection and review of said emails, persons using work email can develop privacy rights in their work email, and work space as well. Quite often U.S. Attorney's Offices require a search warrant for the assigned office space to a Federal employee and demand evidence that Federal email is monitored and inspected before allowing Federal employee email to be used in a criminal prosecution, or just do not use said email for criminal prosecution to avoid claims of what is called in law Reasonable Expectation of Privacy (REP). Furthermore, since there was no evidence that any person was mistreated by the named emailers on the basis of race, as the emails are clearly contemptuous of blacks and Barack Hussein Obama, as well as Michelle Obama.  However, no person, much less the Obamas can claim any harm from these email actors.  [Ferguson Releases Racist Emails That Sent Employees Packing, by Jennifer Mann, St. Louis Post Dispatch, April 4, 2015]

That week, Ferguson police Capt. Rick Henke and Sgt. William Mudd resigned and Court Clerk Mary Ann Twitty was fired over the emails. They did not receive severance packages.
Until now, it was not known who sent which emails and whether there were recipients beyond those three individuals.

And it appears that of the three, there was only one who sent the majority of the emails:

Based on what the city released Friday, it appears most of the emails were sent from Twitty to the officers. Mudd did send one email to Twitty that made cracks about welfare recipients being unemployed, unable to speak English, lazy and having no “clue who their daddies are.”  

So, for two FPD officers, one email for Mudd was enough to force him to resign, and apparently no emails were sent by Henke, and despite there being no connection between the emails and their performance on the job.  Nor was there any evidence that the emails were sent by Twitty were connected to any work performance issues.  She sent a private message which no person complained about.  If she had said the jokes to a member of the public while on official business, one might have an issue, but that did not occur. 

So, for millions of dollars spent on this investigation, only seven private emails were discovered that in the end did not show any actual failure or misconduct on the job.  But it is not within the authority of the CRD to investigate the private opinions of Americans.  And these are the same people who tell us that communists and Islamists have the right to hold government jobs.  Clearly the CRD opinion of freedom of speech is not content neutral.  It has identified opinions, in fact just jokes, that are not approved, and sought to deprive persons of life, liberty, and property, and did so successfully.

Across the country, the same situation was occurring in San Francisco. The DOJ was conducting a criminal investigation into police corruption in the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) and managed to convict two officers of several accused of robbing drug dealers

However, as part of the investigation, the FBI released to the SFPD personal texts unrelated to the investigation from the accused officers to other officers unrelated to the investigation.  [San Francisco Police Officers to Be Dismissed Over Racist Texts, by Timothy Williams, NYT April 23, 2015]

San Francisco’s police chief said Friday that he had moved to dismiss seven officers who sent or received text messages that spoke of lynching African-Americans and burning crosses.
Greg Suhr, the police chief, said Friday that the texts, sent by the officers in 2011 and 2012, "are of such despicable thinking that those responsible clearly fall below the minimum standards required to be a police officer.”
The messages — which included one that said, simply, “White Power,” as well as others with denigrating comments about homosexuals, Mexicans and Filipinos — were sent or received by as many as 14 officers in the department, the police said.
Officials have acknowledged that the texts have shaken confidence in the Police Department, which is responsible for public safety in a city that has long prided itself on inclusiveness and open-mindedness, has a large gay and lesbian population, and is among the most racially diverse cities in the country.

So, 2-3 year old texts unrelated to work are to be used as justification to fire white officers.  There is no evidence that they acted unlawfully either on the job or off.  More disturbingly is how the FBI came across the texts.  The FBI could have obtained the texts as part of the ongoing investigation with a Grand Jury subpoena or through a Title III intercept.  In either case, the FBI would have been prohibited from releasing the information to the SFPD as Grand Jury information cannot be released except during trial, and this information was not released during the above trial of the two officers. 

(A) Disclosure of a grand-jury matter—other than the grand jury's deliberations or any grand juror's vote—may be made to:
(i) an attorney for the government for use in performing that attorney's duty;
(ii) any government personnel—including those of a state, state subdivision, Indian tribe, or foreign government—that an attorney for the government considers necessary to assist in performing that attorney's duty to enforce federal criminal law


The FBI is also prohibited from monitoring or retaining any information during a Title III intercept that is not directly related to the criminal acts identified in the affidavit in support of that Title III intercept. Criminals know this, so always start out their voice communications with innocuous conversations, if they are smart, so the intercepting agency has to stop the intercept of that call.  The same with texts except that unless there is information in the text itself about the crime, in this case stealing from drug dealers, the unrelated texts must be deleted from the intercepting device.

In either event, the FBI acted illegally by providing the subject texts to the SFPD.  Remember, opinions on race, whether it's that the black wife of a house guest is a thief, or whatever, is irrelevant to a criminal investigation, is illegal to collect or hold, and of no concern to the FBI.  There is no racism exception to the First Amendment.

In the end, any illegal or unconstitutional act will be permitted to wage war on whites, whether they be police officers, clerks, or frat boys. And of course, no one is monitoring blacks, Asians, Hispanics, or homosexuals for hate speech or racism.  Only whites are the target, just as homosexual activists and cultural Marxists are ignoring Muslim bakers who refuse to make gay wedding cakes.  Only straight whites are acceptable targets for illegal investigation, defenestration, and dekulakization.